SSDs vs HDDs
Discover which storage space device is more effective for your hosting account
For years there was a single reputable way for you to keep information on a computer – having a hard drive (HDD). Then again, this type of technology is actually expressing it’s age – hard disk drives are actually loud and slow; they can be power–ravenous and tend to create a lot of warmth in the course of intense operations.
SSD drives, on the other hand, are fast, consume a smaller amount power and are also much cooler. They provide an exciting new method of file accessibility and data storage and are years in advance of HDDs with regard to file read/write speed, I/O effectiveness and power efficiency. Discover how HDDs fare up against the more recent SSD drives.
1. Access Time
With the arrival of SSD drives, file access speeds are now through the roof. With thanks to the completely new electronic interfaces utilised in SSD drives, the average data file access time has been reduced towards a record low of 0.1millisecond.
The technology driving HDD drives dates all the way to 1954. And while it’s been drastically processed progressively, it’s nevertheless can’t stand up to the ground breaking technology behind SSD drives. With today’s HDD drives, the top data access speed you are able to reach can vary in between 5 and 8 milliseconds.
2. Random I/O Performance
The random I/O performance is really important for the effectiveness of a file storage device. We have run substantial trials and have established an SSD can deal with at the very least 6000 IO’s per second.
Throughout the exact same lab tests, the HDD drives confirmed to be significantly slower, with 400 IO operations addressed per second. Even though this may seem like a significant number, for those who have a hectic web server that contains numerous well–liked web sites, a slow harddrive may lead to slow–loading web sites.
3. Reliability
The absence of moving components and rotating disks inside SSD drives, and also the latest advancements in electrical interface technology have resulted in a significantly reliable file storage device, having an typical failing rate of 0.5%.
As we have previously observed, HDD drives rely upon spinning disks. And something that employs a large number of moving components for continuous amounts of time is more likely to failure.
HDD drives’ typical rate of failing varies somewhere between 2% and 5%.
4. Energy Conservation
SSDs lack moving components and need not much cooling down power. Additionally, they require a small amount of power to perform – tests have revealed that they can be operated by a standard AA battery.
In general, SSDs take in amongst 2 and 5 watts.
From the second they were made, HDDs were always really electricity–greedy products. And when you have a server with several HDD drives, this will increase the regular electric bill.
Typically, HDDs take in between 6 and 15 watts.
5. CPU Power
Because of SSD drives’ greater I/O effectiveness, the key web server CPU can work with file requests much faster and preserve time for different procedures.
The common I/O delay for SSD drives is exactly 1%.
When using an HDD, you will need to dedicate extra time waiting for the results of your data ask. It means that the CPU will be idle for much more time, awaiting the HDD to react.
The regular I/O wait for HDD drives is about 7%.
6.Input/Output Request Times
It is time for several real–world illustrations. We ran an entire platform backup with a hosting server using only SSDs for file storage purposes. During that process, the common service time for any I/O call kept beneath 20 ms.
During the same trials with the same web server, this time around installed out with HDDs, functionality was significantly sluggish. All through the hosting server backup process, the average service time for I/O calls ranged somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.
7. Backup Rates
Yet another real–life advancement is the rate at which the backup has been made. With SSDs, a web server backup currently takes only 6 hours implementing our server–optimized software.
Alternatively, with a server with HDD drives, the same back up could take three to four times as long to finish. A full back–up of any HDD–equipped hosting server may take 20 to 24 hours.
Should you want to immediately improve the overall performance of one’s sites with no need to modify any kind of code, an SSD–equipped hosting service is really a good option. Have a look at the Linux shared hosting – our solutions offer swift SSD drives and are available at good prices.
Hepsia
- Live Demo
Service guarantees
- EARNOVA.COM’s Virtual Private Servers come with no setup rates and function in a stable network delivering 99.9% of uptime. Full root/administrator access to the server guaranteed.
Compare our prices
- Have a look at our price list and select the best Virtual Private Server for your active websites. You can easily move up to a more feature–rich VPS Web Hosting setup with simply a click of the mouse.
- Compare our hosting plans
Contact Us
- You’re able to get in contact with us 24/7 by email or by making use of our extra–fast ticketing platform. EARNOVA.COM offers a 1–hour reply time guarantee.